Angular Development
Angular applications for teams that want structure, typing and a framework that holds up across a large codebase.
Angular is opinionated in a way that pays off at scale. TypeScript throughout, dependency injection, a defined project structure and a first-party router, forms and HTTP layer — so large teams write recognisably similar code and a new developer finds their way around quickly. That structure is overhead on a small project and an asset on a large one.
Who this is for
Enterprises with substantial internal applications and multiple developers. Teams that value convention over per-project choices. Companies with an existing Angular application needing modernisation or a version upgrade.
Problems we solve
- Version lag. Stuck several major versions back, with each deferral making the next upgrade harder.
- Slow change detection. Default strategies causing sluggish UI on data-heavy screens.
- Large bundles. No lazy loading, so first load pulls the entire application.
- Memory leaks. Subscriptions never unsubscribed, degrading long-lived sessions.
- AngularJS still in production. A framework long past end of life.
What we build
- Angular applications with standalone components and typed reactive forms
- Lazy-loaded feature modules and route-level code splitting
- OnPush change detection and signals for predictable performance
- NgRx or signal-based state where the application's complexity warrants it
- Version upgrades taken step by step with the official migration tooling
- Jest and Cypress test coverage on the paths that matter
How we work
We keep the framework's conventions, because consistency is most of Angular's value on a large team. Performance is addressed with OnPush and signals rather than by scattering manual change detection calls. Upgrades run one major version at a time using the official schematics — jumping several at once is where these projects usually stall.
Technologies we use
Angular with TypeScript, RxJS and signals, NgRx where state complexity justifies it, Angular Material or a custom component library, Jest and Cypress for testing, with Laravel or Node.js backends.
Business benefits
- A consistent codebase that a large team can work in without stepping on each other
- TypeScript catching a whole class of errors before runtime
- A predictable release cadence you can plan upgrades around
- Faster onboarding, because the structure is the same across projects
Common questions
Angular or React?
Angular where you want batteries included and enforced consistency across a large team. React where you want flexibility and a lighter footprint. Both are sound; the team and the project size usually decide it.
Can you upgrade our old Angular version?
Yes, one major version at a time with the official migration tooling and tests in place. Skipping versions is what makes these upgrades fail.
What about AngularJS?
It is long past end of life and should be migrated. That is a rewrite of the front end rather than an upgrade, and we plan it incrementally where the application allows.
Running Angular a few versions behind? The gap only gets more expensive.